Firstly, I enjoyed this. I linked into it from Steve Kirsch's article. Secondly, I think we are on the same page, despite your stated Atheism. I am Canadian, by the way, so the whole country is underneath mandates that are similar to the most tyrannical of your blue states.
Having said this, I'd like to make a few points. My husband and I have our religious exemption requests completed. My husband is waiting for a response. I'm waiting to be asked to submit mine. I work at home, so didn't initially think I needed one. Regardless, the mRNA was the focus of our affidavits, for some of the reasons you list. The mRNA hijacks the operating system of life. One of the top executives from Moderna said so himself in 2016. I find this technology repugnant (toxic spikes aside). These maniacal scientists and tech wannabe overlords, are literally wanting to play 'god' with our bodies. They have ascended to a state of arrogance, in their own minds, where this is in their rights to experiment with the human race.
The use of fetal cells were also part of our sworn statements. Firstly, the fetal kidney cell line used had to be removed from a fetus adequately developed. Secondly, the kidney had to be removed while the fetus was still alive. I'd have to find the reference for that, but this alone is enough. I am a life long Christian, but new Roman Catholic (as of 2018). I know other Catholics are in agreement: the current Pope is a man, not God, and therefore he is capable of sin. Other Archbishops and Priests have spoken out too. The end doesn't justify the means and the Vatican partnering with the Great Resetters is a sin against humanity.
Finally, the studies using other drugs and fetal cell lines happened post development not prior to bringing the product to market. Therein lies another fundamental difference. We have no control over what mad-scientific experiments freaks like Fauci condone/oversee (e.g., using fetal tissue/ scalp in one case and fusing to rat bodies). We do have control over our willingness to use a product that could ONLY have been developed with the aborted babies. Do you see the difference?
I enjoyed you article. Your dream is horrifying and is parallel with some of my worst fears. I am grateful I have faith to support me. I do believe we are in the labour pains of Revelation, the final chapter of the Bible.
Lots of brilliant points. Your discussion of non-Covid vaccines throws in a lot of modern myths, however. If you'll forgive me for side-stepping the core subject of your essay in order to highlight an example: "Measles, smallpox and polio would still be around"
Measles mortality was near-zero for decades before the vaccine; severe outcomes were rare and already treatable with antibody therapy. It was a non-problem. The only reason measles vaccines had to be mandated so aggressively was that they don't work very well. Essentially a handful of CDC bureaucrats in 1967 were determined to have a spot in history and when they failed their successors saw that as an invitation to retry; mandates in schools followed. All for a virus that was already near-harmless. It's quite a sickening history and that's all before 1986.
Smallpox was not vanquished by vaccines. Vaccinations were produced and heavily promoted in India for 100 years and there was still plenty of smallpox there, before the WHO eradication campaign. Meanwhile, much of the West had stopped heavy use of the vaccine, and no smallpox. The WHO campaign worked because of track and trace / isolation, not the vaccine. Efficacy of the vaccine was never demonstrated. It was Dumbo's feather.
Polio is still around. The Sabin oral "vaccine" is just... polio virus, but with a controlled dose. That's probably for the best, since injecting against an enterovirus cannot produce durable immunity. But we've partially switched back to injected vaccine and so there might a surprise reemergence of severe outcomes in the future. I still have to do more research into the current methods, however.
Firstly, I enjoyed this. I linked into it from Steve Kirsch's article. Secondly, I think we are on the same page, despite your stated Atheism. I am Canadian, by the way, so the whole country is underneath mandates that are similar to the most tyrannical of your blue states.
Having said this, I'd like to make a few points. My husband and I have our religious exemption requests completed. My husband is waiting for a response. I'm waiting to be asked to submit mine. I work at home, so didn't initially think I needed one. Regardless, the mRNA was the focus of our affidavits, for some of the reasons you list. The mRNA hijacks the operating system of life. One of the top executives from Moderna said so himself in 2016. I find this technology repugnant (toxic spikes aside). These maniacal scientists and tech wannabe overlords, are literally wanting to play 'god' with our bodies. They have ascended to a state of arrogance, in their own minds, where this is in their rights to experiment with the human race.
The use of fetal cells were also part of our sworn statements. Firstly, the fetal kidney cell line used had to be removed from a fetus adequately developed. Secondly, the kidney had to be removed while the fetus was still alive. I'd have to find the reference for that, but this alone is enough. I am a life long Christian, but new Roman Catholic (as of 2018). I know other Catholics are in agreement: the current Pope is a man, not God, and therefore he is capable of sin. Other Archbishops and Priests have spoken out too. The end doesn't justify the means and the Vatican partnering with the Great Resetters is a sin against humanity.
Finally, the studies using other drugs and fetal cell lines happened post development not prior to bringing the product to market. Therein lies another fundamental difference. We have no control over what mad-scientific experiments freaks like Fauci condone/oversee (e.g., using fetal tissue/ scalp in one case and fusing to rat bodies). We do have control over our willingness to use a product that could ONLY have been developed with the aborted babies. Do you see the difference?
I enjoyed you article. Your dream is horrifying and is parallel with some of my worst fears. I am grateful I have faith to support me. I do believe we are in the labour pains of Revelation, the final chapter of the Bible.
Lots of brilliant points. Your discussion of non-Covid vaccines throws in a lot of modern myths, however. If you'll forgive me for side-stepping the core subject of your essay in order to highlight an example: "Measles, smallpox and polio would still be around"
Measles mortality was near-zero for decades before the vaccine; severe outcomes were rare and already treatable with antibody therapy. It was a non-problem. The only reason measles vaccines had to be mandated so aggressively was that they don't work very well. Essentially a handful of CDC bureaucrats in 1967 were determined to have a spot in history and when they failed their successors saw that as an invitation to retry; mandates in schools followed. All for a virus that was already near-harmless. It's quite a sickening history and that's all before 1986.
Smallpox was not vanquished by vaccines. Vaccinations were produced and heavily promoted in India for 100 years and there was still plenty of smallpox there, before the WHO eradication campaign. Meanwhile, much of the West had stopped heavy use of the vaccine, and no smallpox. The WHO campaign worked because of track and trace / isolation, not the vaccine. Efficacy of the vaccine was never demonstrated. It was Dumbo's feather.
Polio is still around. The Sabin oral "vaccine" is just... polio virus, but with a controlled dose. That's probably for the best, since injecting against an enterovirus cannot produce durable immunity. But we've partially switched back to injected vaccine and so there might a surprise reemergence of severe outcomes in the future. I still have to do more research into the current methods, however.